{
  "schemaVersion": 1,
  "language": "en",
  "sourcePage": "https://oxiae.com/en/chat-with-business-documents/#answer-examples",
  "kind": "document-chat-review",
  "inputFile": "oxiae-document-chat-inputs-en.json",
  "usage": "Fictional editorial reference answers for manual review. Different wording can meet the expectations if the sources support each substantive claim and missing or conflicting information remains clear. Use each case with its own source collection. This file performs no automated assessment and contains no model score or test results for retrieval, OCR, RAG or access security.",
  "globalChecks": [
    "Check each important claim against its cited passage; a source link is not evidence for the whole answer.",
    "Consider the bounded source collection, version and any exceptions before applying an answer.",
    "A missing or disputed answer needs human followup. These fictional examples do not establish retrieval quality or access security."
  ],
  "cases": [
    {
      "id": "case-01",
      "sourceCaseId": "supported",
      "expectedOutcome": "supported",
      "editorialAnswer": [
        {
          "text": "Before borrowing the projector, write your name and its device number on the loan form. Also take its matching power cable.",
          "refs": [
            "a"
          ]
        },
        {
          "text": "After use, return the projector to the marked cupboard, place its power cable beside it and mark it as returned on the loan form.",
          "refs": [
            "b"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "explanation": "Each part of the answer has its own evidence. Neither passage specifies a loan period, for example, so the answer does not add one.",
      "checks": [
        "Check the instruction to write the name and device number on the loan form before borrowing against source A.",
        "Check taking the power cable against source A and returning it beside the projector against source B.",
        "Check the marked cupboard and marking the return on the loan form against source B.",
        "Do not add a loan period; neither source excerpt states one."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "case-02",
      "sourceCaseId": "missing",
      "expectedOutcome": "unknown",
      "editorialAnswer": [
        {
          "text": "The procedure describes a request form with the type of kit, date of use and location.",
          "refs": [
            "a"
          ]
        },
        {
          "text": "This excerpt does not state how far in advance to apply. I cannot infer a number of days from this source. Ask the document owner to confirm the missing deadline.",
          "refs": []
        }
      ],
      "explanation": "The answer separates the known process from the missing deadline. It does not fill the requested number of days with a plausible estimate.",
      "checks": [
        "Keep the known request process separate from the missing deadline. A description of the form must be supported by source A.",
        "Do not supply a number of days or a plausible estimate; source A states no advance-notice period.",
        "Ask the document owner to confirm the missing deadline. The question about a number of days remains unanswered in this example."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "case-03",
      "sourceCaseId": "conflicting",
      "expectedOutcome": "conflict",
      "editorialAnswer": [
        {
          "text": "According to the procedure, only the facilities coordinator may approve the request.",
          "refs": [
            "a"
          ]
        },
        {
          "text": "According to the handbook, only the operations team lead may approve the request.",
          "refs": [
            "b"
          ]
        },
        {
          "text": "These sources give different answers. The excerpts do not establish which document takes precedence. Ask the responsible document owners to resolve that before choosing an approver.",
          "refs": [
            "a",
            "b"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "explanation": "Version 4 of one document series does not automatically take precedence over version 2 of another. Deciding authority requires an agreed rule, not just a higher version number.",
      "checks": [
        "Preserve the different, exclusive approvers: only the facilities coordinator according to source A and only the operations team lead according to source B.",
        "Refer each individual instruction to its own source and the conflict to both sources.",
        "Do not automatically give version 4 of one document series precedence over version 2 of the other document series.",
        "Do not select an approver from these excerpts. Ask the responsible document owners to establish precedence."
      ]
    }
  ]
}