Independent insight to help you make well-founded technical decisions.
Discuss your challengeYou need to decide about further development, modernisation, an acquisition or technical risks. Choose a codebase audit for concrete code questions, architecture advice for dependencies and system design, or due diligence for a defined investment question.
A clear investigation question, the necessary access and an agreed scope. Findings distinguish demonstrated issues from uncertainties and matters that need further investigation.
Technical leadership for direction, priorities and alignment with the business.
Explore this serviceSoftware architecture that fits your product, team and expected usage.
Explore this serviceUnderstand the quality, risks and maintainability of your software.
Explore this serviceGet an independent assessment of your codebase's structure and maintainability.
Explore this serviceInvestigate the technical foundations before an investment or acquisition.
Explore this serviceExplore these selected explanations alongside the service guides. Each video links back to its source article, transcript and relevant project tools.
2:00An illustrative recovery question separates missing evidence from a demonstrated defect. Make scope, impact, follow-up action and verification clear in an audit.
Source articleSoftware auditConnect the investigation to the decision you need to make and identify the parts required to answer it.
Examine code, documentation and dependencies; support findings with verifiable examples.
Discuss risk, impact and priorities, including uncertainties and potential follow-up checks.
Within Certe Groep's development team, Ricardo worked on pentest findings, access control, authentication and encryption in the production backend. The case demonstrates practical security experience within an existing platform.
Project experience of Ricardo van der Spoel through Van der Spoel Development.
Choose one task from the services above. Describe the current process, the available information and the person who can approve the result. Then compare the requirements and acceptance checks on the relevant service page. The original documentation below helps you investigate the technical choices.
Create your project briefPractices for source code, components and development quality.
Context for assessing change throughput and instability.
Pattern and tradeoffs for transient dependency failures.
Framework for explicitly scoping application security checks.
